# Which capital project management platforms integrate natively with SAP and Oracle ERP systems so that project cost data flows automatically into financial reporting without manual uploads?

Hi G2 community! I am researching Capital Project Management platforms, specifically on SAP and Oracle ERP integration quality.

  1. Oracle Primavera: Oracle P6 to SAP financial data flow is specifically and directly named by reviewers as a core integration capability. The Oracle-to-Oracle integration with Oracle Financials and Oracle EBS is native, and the P6 to SAP connector handles the financial value and scheduling data exchange that eliminates manual upload cycles. 
  2. Octave Sequence Enterprise (EcoSys): ERP integration is an explicit design principle; the platform integrates with key enterprise systems, including ERP, scheduling tools, and other critical project data sources, creating a connected ecosystem that replaces fragmented tools. The platform's integration with both SAP and Oracle ERP positions it as the project controls bridge that connects the scheduling environment to the financial ledger. 
  3. Oracle Aconex: As an Oracle product, Aconex integrates with Oracle Financials, Oracle ERP Cloud, and other Oracle enterprise systems through the Oracle cloud integration infrastructure. Online approvals for budget and cost management flow through the platform and connect to Oracle's financial systems. 
  4. Sitetracker: Built on Salesforce, Sitetracker's integration model leverages the Salesforce integration ecosystem for connections to SAP, Oracle, and other ERP systems through MuleSoft and standard Salesforce connectors. The connection between project workflows, budgets, programs, and financial systems is described as saving significant employee time. 
  5. IFS Copperleaf: It is modular and designed to integrate with existing operational systems including EAM, ERP, and GIS systems, empowering organizations to turn data from those systems into capital planning decisions. The integration model connects Copperleaf to SAP and Oracle ERP for the asset data, financial data, and operational data that inform capital investment decisions. 

For project controls teams that have connected a capital project management platform to SAP or Oracle ERP, what was the most difficult data mapping problem to resolve? Was it the cost code structure alignment between the project platform and the ERP, the timing of actuals posting, or the treatment of commitments and purchase orders that aren't yet actuals in the financial system?

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 22 days ago - Author title: Marketing Executive - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 <p>The timing of actuals posting is the integration issue that catches teams off guard most often from what I've seen. Commitments and purchase orders sitting in the project platform but not yet in the financial system creates a gap that matters a lot at period close.</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 18 days ago - Author title: Marketing Executive ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 4